develop your mind β reduces chance ex will leave β makes both happy :)π
my ex said she didnt want to start over. but then we got back together 7 years later.
think of it like an RPG like morrowind or baldurs gate - many paths β more points in utility spells to help solve more scenarios π
RPGs are a model of reality
lets reverse roles - more empathy good - thanks honey i accept and learn from good feedback
what i would have done differently to keep rena?
Specific practices which helped me?
learn to obey what others want always!
therapy
offer marriage at right time ?
yoga with more discipline
more spanking during sexy time
better conversation
meditation
marcus aurelius - conscious deliberate thinking and action
journal
more good deeds - healthy self respect = character ???
blog everyday !
consciously examine choices - never make same mistake twice !
cold plunge!
learn levels of energy
read more books - take notes
talk to more girls β drink fireball
have more threesomes!
dont smoke too much weed - put phone away
drop what doesnt serve you
accept and learn from good feedback
dont care about things dont matter
always be examining
stories intertwine - make sures its a good story - cant hide anything
finnite hours in a day β only do what's observable β only what wife wants to talk about
be more funny
βHow do you learn to see the world through a psychedelic lens without taking psychedelics? You can't be high all the time, lol.β
make more cool stuff - portfolio / blog ?
hike on mushrooms! develop more insight?
The key is to train yourself to experience ordinary reality with less automatic judgment, more curiosity, more wonder, and greater flexibility in how you interpret things.
You don't need to hallucinate to experience something profound. You can change how you pay attention, what you notice, and what meaning you give things.
There's a useful distinction:
Perception: What am I actually seeing, hearing, and feeling?
Interpretation: What story is my mind constructing about it?
Awareness: Can I observe both without immediately believing the story?
Here's how I'd practice it.
A 20-minute daily practice
Rhymember | Turn Study Notes Into Songs That Stick Forever
1. See familiar things as if for the first time β 5 minutes
Look at a tree, your hand, or a glass of water. Notice colors, shadows, textures, reflections, and movements without immediately naming them.
Ask: What would this look like if I'd never seen it before?
7 Rare Traits of Deeply Spiritual Individuals That Set Them Apart | by Denise Williams | Medium
2. Observe your mind thinking β 5 minutes
Sit comfortably and notice each thought as it appears. Rather than following it, quietly label it memory, planning, judgment, or imagination.
Ask: Can I watch a thought without becoming absorbed in it?
Colorful houses along the canal in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3. Deliberately change perspectives β 5 minutes
Take something you believe and imagine three genuinely different ways of understanding it. For example, a rainy day could be inconvenient, nourishing for plants, or visually beautiful.
Ask: What else could be true? What am I failing to notice?
Best Places to Stargaze Near Flagstaff Vacation Rentals
4. Cultivate awe and interconnectedness β 5 minutes
Consider how your body depends on sunlight, food, water, ecosystems, and countless other people's work. Try to feel gratitude rather than merely think about it.
Ask: How many things had to happen for this moment to exist?
A powerful exercise: The ordinary object experiment
Pick up an ordinary cup.
Minimalist Mug in Sunlight Photo on Lummi
CHOOSE A WAY TO SEE IT
Perception
Science
Connection
Imagination
Imaginative perception
Imagine you are an alien seeing this object for the first time. What strange ritual might you think it serves? Invent three completely different uses.
What happens when I stop assuming I know what it is?
The interesting thing is that the cup hasn't changed, but your experience of it has. That's a trainable ability.
The deeper skill: Changing your relationship to thought
There are three particularly useful disciplines here.
Mindfulness: Learn to notice experience before automatically reacting to it.
Metacognition: Recognize that the meaning you assign to an experience is constructed by your mind, and can often be reconsidered.
Cognitive flexibility: Practice holding multiple interpretations without needing to immediately decide which one is correct.
This connects beautifully with Marcus Aurelius's Stoicism: distinguish the event itself from the judgment you form about it. The difference is that you're not merely trying to become more rational. You're also learning to experience more beauty, playfulness, and curiosity.
One more exercise I'd recommend: once a day, take a 20-minute walk without headphones or a phone. Find ten beautiful, surprising, or strange things that you'd ordinarily ignore. Don't force yourself to feel anything; practice noticing.
After two weeks, look for changes in your everyday curiosity, emotional flexibility, and appreciation rather than trying to reproduce a drug-induced state. These practices won't reliably reproduce psychedelic effects, but they can help cultivate some of the qualities people value in those experiences.
The goal isn't to be in an extraordinary state all the time. It's to become extraordinarily attentive to ordinary life.
specfic people who helped me
learn from pierre
stream is my ex they will only help me if i change
Improving other peopleβs well-being is a major part of Stoic virtue, but it is not the whole thing.
For the Stoics, a human being is both rational and social. So living well means using reason well and relating to other people well.
Virtue = understanding reality as clearly as you can, choosing what is just and appropriate, and acting with courage and self-commandβfor both your own character and th good of the human community.
So yes, helping others matters enormously. Marcus repeatedly treats humans as parts of one larger organism: what benefits the community generally benefits the individual part too.
Suppose your friend is addicted to gambling and asks you for money. Giving it to them might increase their immediate pleasure, but refusing may be the more virtuous action.
Suppose someone wants you to lie to protect their reputation. The lie might temporarily reduce their suffering, but justice and honesty could require telling the truth.
Suppose someone is angry because you established a reasonable boundary. Their emotional well-being may temporarily decrease, while your action is still fair and appropriate.
They'd mean something closer to human flourishingβbecoming capable, reasonable, cooperative, courageous, trustworthy, and able to live well.
So the Stoic question isn't simply:
βWill this increase their happiness?β
It's closer to:
βWhat does wisdom and justice require of me toward this person?β
You can still keep the practical insight without accepting all the metaphysics:
Reality is not necessarily personally attacking you. Events arise from causes. Separate what happened from the story that the universe has wronged you, then decide what response is actually good.
The shortest translation would be:
βNature has no grudge against you. Things happen as part of the larger order of reality. External events may hurt, but they do not automatically corrupt your character. Your task is to respond well to what nature gives you.β
And there's another component: your own inner governance.
Imagine you could increase everyone else's happiness enormously, but you had to become dishonest, cruel, cowardly, and completely enslaved to your impulses to do so.
A Stoic would say something has gone fundamentally wrong. You aren't merely an instrument for producing other people's pleasant experiences. You are also responsible for the quality of the person doing the acting.
VIRTUE
β
βββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββ
β β β
understand reality govern yourself relate well
β β β
wisdom self-control justice
β |
courage common goodAnd these interact.
For Marcus, the mature human isn't asking only:
βWhat do I want?β
nor only:
βWhat does everyone else want?β
but:
βGiven that I am one human among other humans, what is the most reasonable, just, courageous, and disciplined thing to do here?β
That is much closer to what he means by virtue.
And if you wanted to compress the social part into one sentence:
Virtue means becoming the kind of person who can see clearly, govern himself, and reliably contribute to human flourishing.
insult
β
anger
β
"What actually happened?"
β
"Is my interpretation correct?"
β
"What response is appropriate?"
β
chosen action
While doing these ordinary social duties, remember that you are one small part of a much larger whole.
That keeps ego from taking over.
Instead of:
βLook how important I am for helping.β
it becomes:
βThis is simply what a rational and social being does.β
Find your peace in doing the next good thing for others, then the next one, while remembering that you are part of something larger than yourself.
| βWhatever the nature of reality ultimately is, I don't need metaphysical certainty before I can behave courageously, justly, rationally, and helpfully.β
Dont take it too personally what people think
THE UNIVERSE
ββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββ
β β
CHAOS ORDER
β β
things arise/dissolve providence/nature
β β
don't cling trust
β β
ββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββ
β
YOUR RESPONSE
β
Don't be disturbed
β
Choose virtue
β
Do the good in front of yousee clearly
β
help where you can
β
act justly
β
move to the next task
β
remember the whole
Don't waste your short life fighting reality.
So life becomes something like:
help
β
work
β
speak honestly
β
care for someone
β
solve a problem
β
help againNot one giant heroic act.
Just one useful human action after another.
Logic was particularly important
Marcus was trained to examine impressions.
Something happens:
βHe insulted me.β
Then your mind immediately produces:
βHe has harmed me.β
βThis is terrible.β
βI must retaliate.β
Stoic training asks:
EVENT
β
IMPRESSION
β
Is the impression accurate?
β
What do I actually know?
β
Should I assent to this judgment?
β
ACTIONINTELLIGENCE
ability to understand and solve
βRATIONALITY
use that ability to judge correctly
+SOCIAL NATURE
recognize other humans as fellow participants
+VIRTUE
wisdom + justice + courage + self-control
βGOOD HUMAN ACTION
This is also why Marcus's daemon isn't simply your intelligence.
A very intelligent person's mind can serve anger, greed, vanity, fear, or ambition.
The Stoic ideal is that the ruling faculty uses reason properly, in accordance with reality and with our social nature.
So I would phrase the relationship like this:
Intelligence gives you the capacity to think. Rationality is the disciplined use of that capacity to see and choose well. Wisdom is knowing what is worth doing with it.
And that's why, for Marcus, merely becoming smarter would not necessarily make you a better human being.
One especially powerful rule
For high emotion:
Don't make important decisions at the peak of the emotion unless action is genuinely urgent.
If you're furious and composing a six-paragraph message, write it if necessary.
Don't necessarily send it.
Come back when the physiological wave has declined and ask:
βDo I still endorse this?β
That's the ruling faculty reclaiming control.
Helping someone flourish vs. making them comfortable
Sometimes they're identical:
feed someone who is hungry
comfort someone grieving
teach someone a useful skill
protect someone from abuse
cooperate on something beneficial
Sometimes they're not:
telling someone something difficult but true
refusing to enable destructive behavior
allowing someone to experience the consequences of their choices
disagreeing respectfully
maintaining boundaries
GOOD ACTION
βββ Is it TRUE / rational?
β
βββ Is it JUST toward other people?
β
βββ Does it promote genuine human flourishing?
β
βββ Does it require COURAGE?
β
βββ Am I exercising SELF-CONTROL?Virtue = the ability to choose and do the good thing for the right reasons.
Your distinctive human task is to use reason to live wellβas a rational, social, embodied being.
activity of the soul in accordance with reason and excellence.
Eudaimonia isn't merely obtaining outcomes.
It's partly about what you become through participating in life.
Tzeentch: ambition, manipulation, schemes, knowledge and change pursued without a stable moral center.
What is actually true?
What evidence supports this?
What am I assuming?
Could I be wrong?
Does my conclusion follow from the evidence?
Am I letting fear, anger, desire, or pride distort my judgment?
Given my goals and values, what action makes sense?
I can only handle one wife β thanks though
REASON:
Why?
What would it cost?
Is my judgment distorted?
Would this harm others?
Am I becoming dependent on it?
What kind of person would this make me?βReason is the faculty by which I can understand what I am, examine what is worth pursuing, and deliberately participate in a good human life.β
Reason + good values + self-control + concern for others.
Some extremely intelligent beings become bad/illogical precisely because intelligence gets recruited by obsession, ambition, fear, pride, or desire.
if you start with nonsense you may reason yourself into a nonsense
REASON
What is actually true?
COURAGE
Can I do what is right despite fear?A person sitting alone reasoning for sixteen hours every day is not necessarily fulfilling human nature.
Reason: understand what is true.
Wisdom: distinguish appearances from reality.
Justice: treat other people properly.
Courage: face pain, uncertainty, loss and difficulty.
Temperance:Am I being controlled by an impulse?
Service: contribute to the human community.
Relationship: participate in other people's lives.
Justice:What is fair to everyone involved?
EVENT
β
clear perception
β
better judgment
β
more proportionate emotion
β
deliberate action
Rationality = how well you use those capacities to form accurate beliefs and make sensible decisions.
And eventually the daemon / ruling faculty doesn't need to fight every emotion like an enemy. Your emotions themselves become increasingly educated by your judgments.
The goal is not βI feel nothing.β
It's:
βI can feel anger without becoming anger. I can feel fear without obeying fear. I can enjoy pleasure without needing pleasure. I can hear the crowd without becoming the crowd.β
Do a two-minute evening review
Marcus's Meditations itself can be understood partly as this kind of practice.
Each night ask:
Where did impulse control me today?
Where did I notice it before acting?
What judgment was underneath the emotion?
What would I like to do next time?
Not:
βI'm terrible because I got angry.β
But:
trigger
β
interpretation
β
emotion
β
action
β
better response next timelove: potentially something much larger: βI care about its flourishing, not merely the pleasure it gives me.β
The transformation is:
emotion β information
instead of:
emotion β command
βknowing others is intelligence;
knowing yourself is true wisdom.
mastering others is strength;
mastering yourself is true power.
β dao de jing
"The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao"
if you change yourself -β others may potentially benefit and learn from it ?
Imagine this future:
OLD WORLD
human effort
β
survival
β
some leisure
β
"What do I want?"
AUTOMATED WORLD
survival handled
β
massive freedom
β
"What do I want?"
β
"Why do I want it?"
β
"What is worth doing?"Automation removes many constraints.
But constraints used to answer part of the purpose question for us.
I need to work because I need food.
Once that disappears, you're left with something much harder:
What deserves my attention during the finite interval in which I exist?
That is almost exactly Marcus's question.
my purpose = to reason??
LOGOS
universal rational order
β
human reason
β
DAIMON
inner rational guide
Who should control civilization if technology gives someone almost god-like abilities?
Marcus: discover and correctly use the divine reason already within you.
Deus Ex: technologically amplify intelligence until human/machine reason begins looking divine.
Comlink in the game is not as sophisticated as the one from telepathy wizards
Donβt wait for a deus ex machina. Consult the daimon.
life is a series of choices. i like to take walk
Marcus keeps relocating power from the outside to the inside:
βCan I control what happened?β β often no.
βCan I control other people?β β no.
βCan I guarantee fortune?β β no.
βCan I examine my judgment and choose my next action?β β yes.